He's a very material writer,
there's a particularity and a specifity
about the sort of imaginative experience he gives us. He writes about things, about
stones, flowers, buildings, hills, clouds, so that you come at his Big
Ideas through the immediate felt experience of
living in the world, and I think that is one of the reasons for his
being so attractive to working communities who had
not necessarily had the training or the intellectual discipline in
processing an abstract idea. If you come at an
idea through looking at a leaf, through looking at a stone, it is that
much more accessible to you. So from that
point of view Ruskin is always enormously attractive to self-taught
people.
BBC Radio 4: In Our Time: 31-03-05
Stanley's Pa, riding his
ladies' bicycle round Cookham on his way to
give music lessons at the 'big houses' and giving voice to his
admiration by declaiming Ruskin to surprised passers-by,
was in good company. Thinkers as diverse as Tolstoy, Proust and Gandhi
were
among the international figures who shared his Ruskin enthusiasm.
Occasionally in their
memoirs we find Stanley and his brother Gilbert poking gentle fun at
Pa's Victorian quirks. But these should not be taken as decrying them.
Each new generation sees its predecessor as outdated while
unconsciously absorbing and sustaining its vitality
in new forms.